Saturday, December 31, 2016

🌍Tulai thusouh chung a lunggel phabep🌍

By: Simon Miphapa

1. Sadar Hills district chu Tangkun-Milong te'n tin-le-ha tho a anadoudal jieh uva anakimu lou ahi. Alangkhat ah Meilhei hon jong eipieh noum dieh lou u anahikit e. Meilhei te chihna ti ding ha phatmo ti ding ham hiche Sadar district hi Kuki te le Kacha Naga ho tatona a man ding atiu ahi. Achaina a abol uchu Kut koun a thenso ding tia thenso louva CM in adalhah a NSCN/UNC ho jieh ahi ti angoh chu ahitai. Ahinlah eiho'n jong "vala in ka thaang kakihet tai," ati bang chun kinahna ding thu iseikit tapou vin, hijieh chun akinepnau alhung tapoi.

*2. Pathen in eiho ding chun apha lam2 eigelpih uvin ahi.* Milong-Tangkun ho jong politics sangtah ahinbol tauvin, ahung kilietsah jah tauvin ahi. Government of India in historic Framework of Agreement ahinnei uchun Ei Kuki te titah louvin Meilhei te jong a nervous leo tauvin ahi. Hijieh chun eiho'n jong bol loichel ding inei choum pouvin, Pathen a itaonau bou ikisonpi tauvin ahi. Hijeh chun Meilhei-Milong in ei noise laitah uvin mi kineosah ho Pathen chun ithum sang uva tamjo eipie tauvin ahi. Aum lou umsah Pathen chun aumsa jong alahmang thei ahi jieh in kilietsah khaget uhite. Asouh jouse hi Meilhei sang a chingjo Government of India in Naga te problems solved bolna ding a asosah ahilam jong iya ihet ham!

3. Tua hi kilietsah ham hoitho kitiho hi man louhiel ding ahi.* Mi kinah jong kipapi lou ding, hahsatna touh ho jong itaopih diu phattah chu ahi. Tu situation hi ivet leh Tangkun-Milong le Meilhei ho kikah a hi suhmil thei louva kinahna chan aphah u ahitai. Hinkho kilahpihtona chan abol lou vang uvin Tangkun ho kitoldohna gari 20+ kihallhahpih kiti chu aban ichan hungsouh ding hitam tihi lung olmo louthei ahitapon ahi. Meilhei ho hi ajonchih kit uvin, Milong (Zalengrong) ho hi ahabol beh kit pouvin ahi. Divide and Rule hung kipan ahiye ti muthei ahi.

4. Meilhei hon Tangkun ho hi aitih a bolchah ding anati jing u ahin, ahivang chun thinglhang miho apankhom ding kichat jieh a anakhongaijiu ahi. Tua hi amaho against a district mithai hop a agahhop ule Noney mite, Kajong mite, Kangpokpi mite, Pherzawl mite, Tengnoupal mite akipah chieh un NSCN(IM)/Tangkun ho akipah tapouve. Hijieh chun Meilhei titah louvin athinglhang mi chankhompi tampi'n jong amaho joh imuda tauvin ahi. Itobang a thiem hitam Ibobi le a strategist le policymakers ho hi!

5. Tangkun ho ahinchai chai uchu aban ipi um ding ham geellou khoh ahi. Tua eiho veeng a ima seilouva Tangkun ho chenna jousea nilhah leh kho asap uva akichatsah uhi kipa umlou tah ahi. TV programme khat "National Geographic Channel" kiti khu ivet leh Humpi khun sa anehkham khat bou adelji'n ahi.

6. Meilhei te'n Three Anti Tribal Bills ahinpouhdoh uva passed ahin bol loichel ujong chu isuhmil loulai diu ahie. Hiche ah chun Thinglhang mite jouse ihung pangkhom un ahileh amaho jong bolkhiel akisa thou uvin ahi. Tun vang athipdel tauvin, ILPS thu jong athip tai. Ahinlah aphat alhin phat leh hung gingdoh thou2 ding ahin, amasa a sang a hung khohsejo ding ahi ti iheuve. Meilhei ho hin step by step strategic plan achepi thei uve tihi isuhmil lou diu ahi.

7. Achung a kisei ho hi Kuki te'n Tangkun-Milong ahilou leh Meilhei ho lang a side lah ding tina hilou vin,* chihtheina saangpen a ikigin diu angaiye tina joh ahijoe. Hijeh chun press released bol ding hihen lang Kuki min a thu seina hijong leh ipi ka sei ding ham tihi eisang a mi dang ho hi hejo ding a gel a kidohto ji ngai ahi. Prime Minister jieng jong khun thu aseina ding a asei ding ho khu midang (IAS) ho'n apiehji ahibouve.

Thil khat ahungso a i-reaction hou hi akivetji leh "Ka pouhna sung a chu koi ka doh ding ham ti attitude umthim in akimu ji'n ahi. Ithusei hou ivet leh ei tobang mimol pen jeng in jong hoi isah lou tampi akimudoh thei jin ahi.

Note:- Kahin jihna a Naga tilouva Kacha Naga ahilou leh eiho kou dan a Tangkun-Milong kanti khu Nagaland Naga ho toh ka seitha nomlou jeh ahi. Nagaland a chu Kuki ho jana kipe nalai ahijeh in hiche thucheng kaman ahi

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Hyderabad Businessman Arrested For 98 Crores 'Black Money' Deposits In Banks Dt. Dec 29, 2016

Hyderabad Businessman Arrested For 98 Crores 'Black Money' Deposits In Banks
Dt. Dec 29, 2016

Hyderabad businessman was arrested for his alleged involvement in cheating.


The businessman generated 'fake and fictitious' advance payment receipts
He runs three jewellery and bullion firms
He produced advance payment receipts for Rs 40 crore in name of another
Hyderabad: A city-based businessman was arrested on Wednesday for allegedly cheating and generating 'fake and fictitious' advance payment receipts to deposit "black money" to the tune of Rs 98 crore in banks following the ban of 500 and 1000-rupee notes last month.

Besides Kailash Chand Gupta (65), his kin and others have also been booked by the police under various sections of Indian Penal Code for their alleged role in the "conspiracy"

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

POTPO-GARI 500 TOBANG IMPHAL LHUNGTA



           UNC in Economic Blockade aboljeh a Jiribam munna tangden truck potpo -500 tobang chu thaupo jaonan security hattah pum'a  Imphal analhung tauve.



                          Chule tuhin Potpo truck 550 tobang ma Jiribam munna aumnalaijin ahi.

           Chule hiche hojong hi nikhat ni-2 sunga security hattah jaona a kithahlut kitding ahi tin State goverment in kitepna jong aneije.

Monday, December 26, 2016

Suspected Terrorists Killed a aman at Baramulla


TULAIHUILHI Updated: Dec 26, 2016

The victim was shot near his residence at Bahrampora in Dangiwacha area of Baramulla.

Srinagar: Suspected terrorists shot dead a person in north Kashmir's Baramulla district on Sunday night, police said.

Nazir Ahmad Mir was shot at by suspected terrorists near his residence at Bahrampora in Dangiwacha area of the district, a police official said.

Mir was rushed to a hospital where he was declared brought dead, the official said.

A case has been registered and a hunt is on to nab the assailants, police said

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

*The Untold Saga Of The Presence Of Kukis In Manipur Since Time Immemorial*


By, Ngulminthang Lhanghal

History, Migration, Records, etc. has been quite a topic these days. I do enjoy reading when our well known Historians share their opinions and views through Print Media, Internets, Networking Sites, etc. etc. This entire hot History topic surfaced recently with one counter claiming the other and vice versa due to the Districthood Demand of Sadar Hills. I do believe that sticking on to Concrete History will be the best way to have a glimpse of our status at present.

Recently, I have been reading lots of Opinions and Articles by our fellow Manipuri Naga Historians who tried their best to portray the position of ''Kukis''. I do accept their views about ''Kuki'' and their Write up History about ''Kuki''. But after reading all of these articles, a big BLANK dominates me. I donot understand what they actually mean by ''Kuki''.
Even after spending hours of concentrating on the Carefully Drafted articles, I still couldn't make out what they actually meant by ''Kuki'' and who they actually meant by ''Kuki People''. Almost all the articles are so twisted that even the sentences counters the other one. Most of our Historians who finds pleasure in falselessly depicting a particular group might not be able to define themselves if i were to ask what they mean by ''Kuki'' and ''Kuki People''. It is therefore best to know what we are talking about when we are to empasize a particular Group.

My purpose of writing this article is neither about Sadar Hills nor Naga History but for a Concrete View on Kuki History in Manipur and North East India based on Colonial Records and Regional Records of Kings or Maharajas. To be frank, I am not a Historian or a Researcher, but as a lover of Literature and a preserver of History, I do like to share my little knowledge of History which I know about.

In Manipur, all of the three Major Ethnic Groups- Meiteis, Kacha Nagas aka Manipuri Nagas and Kukis migrated and settled in the Manipur Soil. None of these three groups were born in Manipur though the period of their migration and settlement can vary from one group to another.(Lalit, 1965, History of Manipur). Colonist writers who mostly wrote about Manipur divided the whole people into two main groups, Kuki and Naga. Tribes which shared the same linguistic group having the same linguistic roots etc were group under Kuki.

On the other hand, tribes who have different linguistic roots and who cannot communicate within themselves in their own dialects were grouped under Naga (Dr Brown, Hill Country and Tribes of Manipur, 1820). In this regard Meiteis were categorised under Kuki owing to the Linguistic affinity with the other Kuki Groups. (Land and People of Indian States and Union Territories, SC Bhatt, Gopal Bhargava, 2001).

Relation between Meiteilon and Kuki-Chin Languages:
History of Meiteis or Meiteilon becomes an essential point while dealing with the History of Kukis in Manipur. It is commonly an accepted fact that Kukis and Meiteis are different groups and different people. Yet the linguistic bond between these two groups always speaks about some unknown History which might have occured. Dr Gierson was the first colonial researcher to present the relationship between Meiteilon and Kuki-Chin Languages.

He categorised Meiteilon as a Kuki-Chin Languages and many researchers followed his views. There are some opposition to Dr Giersion's works of classifying Meiteilon as a Kuki-Chin Language, the latest opposition being from Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh. Though Dr Irengbam tried his best to oppose Dr Giersion's works, he still couldnot find an answer to some of the few facts which Dr Gierson presented about Meiteilon and Kuki-Chin Language. This particular relationship of Meiteilon and Kuki Languages leaves us some sort of Rational Clue about these two groups of People, Meiteis and Kukis.

Researchers who made thorough research on Meiteilon gave their conclusion on Meiteilon this way:
Sino Tibetan > Tibeto-Burman > Arakan Burmese > Kuki-Chin > Manipuri /Meithei / Meitei. Manipuri, popularly known as Meiteilon / Meithei is historically one of the sister languages of Kuki-Chin groups of Arakan Burmese branch of Tibeto-Burman sub-family of Sino-Tibetan family of Language. However, W. Ibohal Singh (1986) opines that old Manipuri, which was developed in 900 A.D., was a product of Pre historic Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman of 800 A.D. Medieval Manipuri, which was developed in 1200 A.D., was again a product of Indo-Aryan and Old Manipuri (1000 A.D). Modern Manipuri (1600 A.D.) is the offshoot of Tibeto-Burman Kuki-Chin group and Medieval Manipuri.

Kuki Status in Manipur Based on Linguistic Research:
The above para which clearly depicts the relationship between Meiteilon and Kuki-Chin clearly speaks about the Historical and Social presence of Kukis in the Hill Country/ Hills of Manipur since time immemorial. Dr W Ibohal in his work clearly presented that Modern Meiteilon which was in use since 1600 AD was based on Medieval Meiteilon and Kuki-Chin Languages.

In the views of a Linguist, Linguistic dominance can never occur in a short period of time. If Meiteilon could be a product of Medieval Meitei and Kuki-Chin, it would mean that the Kukis were very much present in Manipur much before 1600 AD. Taking Meiteis and Kukis into consideration, it would atleast take 200-300 years for one to dominate other or vice versa, not politically or socially but linguistically.
Relationship, Social and Political Influence, Time Period etc are all an essential feature for a particular Linguistic group to fully adopt the other one. Therefore we can clearly conclude that Kukis were present in Manipur much before 1600 AD, contrary to some self-styled Naga Historians representing Kukis in Manipur as arriving by 1850.

''Kukis'' as recorded in the Royal Chronicles of Meitei and Tripura Kings.
The word ''Kuki'' finds a respected position in both of the Chronicles of Meitei and Tripura Kings. In the Royal Chronicles of Tripura, Shiva has been quoted as falling in love with a Kuki Women in around 32 AD. Again in the same Chronicles, we find mention of Tripura Prince marrying a Kuki Princess in 1415 AD. (Basumatry 1920). The Kukis were the single largest tribes inhabiting the Tripura Hills before the rise of the Debbarmas.(Basumatry, 1920). King Dhanya Manikya who ruled Tripura between 1490 - 1520 AD brought home a Gong presented by Kuki Chiefs on one of his friendly visits. (Roy, 1965)

In the Cheitharol Kumbaba, we find that a Kuki by the name Taothingmang became the King of Manipur in 186 Skabda (264 AD). Again in 33 CE, two Kukis by the name Kuki Ahongba and Kuki Achouba were allies to the Nongba Lairen Pakhangba. King Irengba who reigned Manipur between 1107-1127 AD had contacts with Kuki Villages North of Imphal Valley.(Asim Roy, 1997).
L Joychandra (Lost Kingdoms 1995:1), noted that Manipuri King Naofanga who reigned between 624 AD and 714 AD had Friendship Treaties with Kuki Chiefs East of Imphal.

From all these above Historical and Linguistic Evidences it is ample clear that Kukis were present in Manipur as far as History is concerned. This fact contradicts most of our recent Naga Historians depiction of Kukis arriving as late as 1850.

The fact that Col Johnstone recorded Kukis as spotted only around 1850's is not an issue to ponder about. Col Johnstone or any colonial writer never presented or reported that Kukis migrated into Manipur only around 1850. They only spoke about the year when they first came in contact with the Kukis. Had Col Johnstone or Higgins or Mc Cullock, arrived in Manipur in 1600, they would have reported the Kukis as spotted in 1600 AD.
Captain Butler who in 1873 was Deputy Commissioner of Naga Hills in his Report to the Revenue Proceedings 1873, Nos, 120 to 132, mentioned Kacha Nagas as first spotted in 1839 as tribes living in the Jungly Hills due south of the Angami Country (Mc Kenzie, NE frontier of India). Col Johnstone in his report on ''Aggressions of Chassad Kookies'' mentioned '''the Tankhools are Manipur subjects and occupy the Hill country East of the Valley. They were first mentioned in Dr Brown's account of the Hill country and tribes under the rule of Manipur in 1867''.

From all these above Historical accounts, we find that Kacha Nagas aka Manipuri Nagas too were spotted as late as 1860's. Colonial Writings clearly reveal the supremacy of Kukis over the Hill Country in Manipur. The whole of Present Ukhrul and Tamenglong districts traditionally and historically belongs to Kukis (Mc Kenzie,1884). The supremacy of Kukis over the Hills of Manipur have been carefully presented in Capt Brodie's accounts 1842. (Brodie's Tour, 1842, Mc Kenzie).

The Manipuri Nagas who were subjects under Kuki Chieftainship for Centuries do not have any right to question Kuki Inguinity in the Hills of Manipur. Kukis were the sole rulers of the Hill Country and Historical records support this. There have never been mentions of a Tangkhul or Zeliang Naga dominating Kukis in any of the Colonial Writings. Infact most of the colonial writers depicted Manipuri Nagas as Slaves of Kuki, living under the Mercy of Kuki Lords.(Col Johnstone, Report to the Resident at Mandalay, 1873)

In most of the Colonial Writings, we find limited informations on Manipuri Nagas. The word Naga has common occurence in any Colonial Writings but whenever we hunt for Informations on Tangkhuls or any other Kacha Nagas, we run out of Pages. This is simple proof that Tangkhuls or any other Kacha Nagas were not known much. Infact the whole of Kacha Naga/Manipuri Naga populace boomed out only after 1940's(G. Dey 1986:809).
History of Manipuri Nagas in context of Manipuri Kings records depicts them as loyal subjects of Meitei Kings at the same time paying an annual tax ''Changseu'' to their Kuki Lords though their period of Slavery under Kukis in not clear. (History of Manipur, 1998 : 205).

A Tangkhul friend once told me about Tangkhuls in the olden days. He told me that whenever they hear of Kuki Chiefs passing by they use to hide their pigs because if the Chief likes it he simply takes it and his Tangkhul subjects have to watch his actions. Such was the dominance of Kukis over the Hills of Manipur.
Summing up all of these points based on Colonial Writings and Local Records, it is more than clear that Kukis were the sole rulers of the Hill Country. Their power mostly due to their neat administrative setup based on the complete authority of Chiefs. On the other hand, Head Hunting Nagas often fought among themselves which led to many Naga villages seeking refuge of Kuki Chiefs. (Mac Culloch, 1878).

The Meitei religion ''Sanamahi'' is based on the Kuki religion of ''Indoi''(Richard M Eaton 1997). Due to the Rich Cultural Heritage and Neat Administrative Setup, Kukis could rule over the Hill Country, unlike the frequently fighting Head Hunting Nagas. (Mills Report 1854,). In the Assam Proceedings of 1854 Mills presented a survey report of Villages in Manipur Hill Country as follows:
Old Kookies = 89.
New/Naia Kookies = 145.
Tabloong or Naked = 30.
Sangloi or Changnoi =?
Zami Nagas = 5.
Source: Assam Proceddings, 1854, A Mackenzie, Esq., Officiating Secretary to the Govt of Bengal, No-3150, dated Calcutta, the 19th August 1873.

Therefore, we are now left to conclude that the Hills of Manipur except for Mao Dominance were all under the Kuki Chiefs and it belongs to the Kukis traditionally, culturally and historically. The 1993 massacre on innocent Kukis by armed Nagas are ample proof of Kuki dominance in the hills. If the Manipuri Nagas were so dominant they would never have bothered massacring innocent Kukis or someone lower than them that too, in the name of Christ.
Politics of Manipuri Nagas are dirty and condemable to the highest extent possible. Using religion as a shield to flush out past angers on a particular group is one such example. The questions that now arises are:
1. Are Manipuri Nagas in position to question Kuki Ingenuity in the Hills of Manipur.?
2. Are Manipuri Nagas in a position to claim Traditional and Historical Lands of Kukis as rightfully theirs? If so on what historical grounds?
3. Did any Colonial writer ever depict Kukis as living in Naga territory?
4. Which part of Hills in Manipur is traditionally of the Nagas?
5. Did Manipuri Nagas ever rule over the Kukis?
6. Colonial writers never pictured today's Manipuri Nagas as Naga. On what grounds are they Naga?
7. Who ruled over the hills till 1947?

* Ngulminthang wrote this article for e-pao.net . The writer is presently at Nanyang technological Institute, Singapore.

The sender can be contacted at bryanskeeps1(at)gmail(dot)com

This article was posted on October 17, 2011.


_Kuki International Forum_

Sunday, December 18, 2016

KNA - PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH


Mangboi Haokip
President, Kuki National Assembly
Sapormeina 15th Dec’ 16
Kuki mipiten juiding neilou’a ilamvai naohi
akivet leh voujang nat aumin, hiti ahijeh ahi ipihi ki
bolleh phading ham tin Pathen dong pumin, mibang
in kihat kifel hih jongleh ahung kiche pipin, tunihin
i nampiu leh Igam uvin angaichat anaum talou, Kuki
National Assembly hi avella chohing kitna thale
lungthim eipeo Pathen thangvah in umhen. Thil kiti
hi akiphu nini’n alenpai pon ahi. “Insa’a Pakai
apan louleh, Innsa hon panna beiya asah u ahin,
khopi ngah’a Pakai apan louleh kho-ngahpa
mohseh a jaan-hah khovah ahi.” Psalms 127:1
Hiti ahi jehin Pathen phu Pathen sahdoh
ahile ilolhinlel louhel diuhi ikinep nao ahin, Pathen
lhacha ho jaona a iphudoh u ahi. Saul lengpa chu
ana kino vallin, Pathen themgao Samuel bolding
aman ana kibol phatchun, Pathen achung’a alunglhai
tapoi.
Kuki Innpi’n asei theichan, abol theichan
nampi ading in atong jingin, Kuki thingnoi KNO le
UPF in atoh theichan, asei theichan aseijun ahi.
Ahinlah Kuki Innpi leh i-thaldom hou bolthei nalou
seithei nalou munchu Kuki minna I representative
houvin Kuki National Assembly apatna aseilou leh
avatna tampi imakhou va aum kitnin, hichu pelthei
louthil ahi.
A election la umdalou ithalheng diula
kilhen da jilou, ami satin (umbrella) noileh
namdang te koungtol na’a itou un, ideibang un
nampi machal na thule naa itong dohthei pouvin,
amiliim noija ibon’un gole dai ipel jou pouvin ahi.
Kuki National Assembly political party
hi akiphudoh kitjeh a imoh lolhin diu ahipoi. Party
lamkai hon Pathen mai avet na mipi’n KNA
ponlap ijuijing uleh lolhinna chu nailam chan
aumme ti itahsan diu ahi.
Constituency khatna voter 28,000 –
30,000 ium’un, Christian ihisoh un, ahin Christian
mi hijat lamkai ding gamkai’a Lengding’a ju-ne,
salop, sumlop ikilhen dohjiu hi akiven, Kuki
National Assembly ticket som hopdoh nading’a
mipite’n taona a pan ilah uva, KNA General
Assembly honjong phate cha vetchil na kineiding,
Party Candidate dingchu akisonna anei agouleh
asum leh apai, abolthei na hilou ding ahi. Nampi’n
mano taote ati nileh mano ding, tou taote ati nileh
touthim theiding, tumasang a inei ho-utoh kibang
louding. Mipi leh lamkai hon kijet-hei kivei-hei
gei’a kitoh chet na ibol nathei ding uva hi, Kuki
te political party hi lei(bridge) a kahungkido masat
diu, mitcho chatmo gei’a lungtup mun ilhut diuhi, nitin
le phat tinna eiki cholsah theilou uchu ahi.
2017 Election hi Kuki National Assembly’n
“Pakai hi chamna ahi” ti slogan mangcha a election
kitetding, B.J.P le Congress jeha ikidou, ikijep, iki
thajiu hi suhbei a aumna ding, Kukite gam’a Third
Party chun Pathen thu apohding, Thempu, Themgao
tetoh kitho’a “Thao kanusa tongkha hih uvin, ka
themgao hojong bolse hih un”, tin aseiye. I
Chronicles 16:22. Pathen thao nusa hochu koi party
hileh ahung kilu lah nathei diuva, naa-hi hung kitong
ding ahi. Igam uvin lamkai Pathen thaonu iki lhendoh
diuhi, tahsan lelna aki neipon, ichen khompiu jatdang
lah’a kikhel na umhih jongle eiho laha kikhel na aum
nading proof chu vuidoh lou mithi loungko inei
houkhun, thu ilah uva aseijing nge. “Phaicham thuh
taha gancha kumsuh bangin, Pakai lhagaovin
amaho chu aki choldo sahtai. Hijehchun nangma
minthan na dia Namite na lamkai tan ahi.” Isaiah
63:14. Mipha gamle nam adia thi ahiuvin, lamkai pha
ahung kisep nadia muchi chu ahi. Kuki National
Assembly’n amaho tohban chu kila a thichan geiya
Pathen leh mipi kiseilep louding ahi.
“Tua umthil hi ana umsa ahitan, ahung
umkit ding jongchu aumsa ma ahitai, hiche a
Pathen in ahol penchu akidel mangsa chu ahiye.”
Thuhilpa 3:15
Ana umsa Party / kiloikhom nachu ahin, aki
phudoh masa lai’a Kuki hiho jouse hi tribe
recognition jehin tribe chomchom leh nomenclature
thah hojeh in, ikah uva onghom lentah tahleh komthuh
tahtah aumin, eikhen uvin; ikijop matsoh nadiu’a Kuki
National Assembly hi lei’a ikido kitdiu ahi.

Portfolios
of Kuki National Assembly
President : Pu Mangboi Haokip
Secretary : Pu Thangjang Haokip
Treasurer : Pu Mamang Guite
Members : Pu Kaigin Haokip
Pu Paongam
Pu John Haokip
Pu Onmang
Pu Lalboi Guite
Minister : Pu Rev. Mangpithang

KPI (SADAR Hills) DISTRIC Map

SADAR HILLS MAP.

SAIKUL SUB-DIVISION SADAR HILLS HOPSUNGA RECOGNISED KHOMIN HO:


1 A. Geljang
2 A.Longa Koireng
3 A.Tuisomjang
4 Aigejang

5 Ankhumbung
6 B.Bolyang Sadar
7 B.Khayang
8 Belei
9 Bethelphai
10 Bongbal Khullen

11 Bunglung
12 C.Aisan
13 C.Khullen
14 C.Moljol
15 Chahmol

16 Chalkot
17 Challouphai
18 Changsang
19 Chaningpokpi
20 Chingdai Khullen

21 Chingdai Khunou
22 Chingmang
23 Chonjang
24 D.Leikot Sadar
25 Denglen

26 Dimjang
27 Dongsum
28 E.Mullam
29 Ekouphai
30 Ekpan Chingkha

31 Gallam
32 Gampum
33 Gangpikon
34 Gangpiyang
35 Gotangkot

36 Govajang
37 Gunphaijang
38 Gwaltabi Kuki
39 H. Jangnom
40 H.Champhai

41 H.Gelmol
42 H.Khopibung
43 Haokhongching
44 Happy Land

45 Happy Valley
46 Heichanglok
47 Heinganglok
48 Heirokland
49 Holbung
50 Ichai Goyang

51 Irong Tangkhul
52 Jangnoi
53 Jordanphai
54 K.Hengjang
55 K.Khonom

56 K.Nomjang
57 K.Nungmanbi
58 Kaihao Tangkhul
59 Kamu Koireng
60 Kamu Lairok

61 Kamu Saichang
62 Kamu Tampak
63 Kamu Tangnom
64 Kamuching
65 Kaprang

66 Karpur Sungba
67 Keirao Chingdong
68 Khamenlok
69 Kharam Tangkhul
70 Khayang

71 Khokon
72 Khongbal Kuki
73 Khongbal Tangkhul
74 Khongnangpokpi
75 Khouchangbung

76 Komla Ching
77 Kwarok Maring
78 L.Chayang
79 L.Haibung
80 L.Layang

81 L.Molnom
82 L.Songphel
83 Laikoiching
84 Laikot Kom
85 Laikot Phaijol

86 Laiphrok Maring
87 Lairok Vaiphei
88 Lamkajang
89 Leingangpokpi
90 Leisem Lok

91 Leishiphung
92 Lemba Khul
93 Leplen
94 Lhangjol

95 Lhangsom
96 Lhungjang
97 Lungther
98 Luwang Sangol
99 M.Ngamneh
100 Maibung Kom

101 Maibung Likli
102 Makokching
103 Maojang
104 Mapao Christian

105 Mapao Khullen
106 Mapao Thangal
107 Maphou Kuki
108 Moirangpan
109 Moljol
110 Molkon

111 Molkonbung
112 Molkot
113 Molvom Sadar
114 Mongneljang
115 Mongyang Sadar

116 N.Chaljang
117 N.Heikon
118 N.Molhoiphai
119 N.Phailen
120 N.Terakhong

121 N.Zilphai
122 Naphai
123 New Boljang
124 New Saikul
125 New Salem

126 Ng. Phainom
127 Ngakhapat
128 Ngarumphung
129 Ngoupikhong Vaiphei
130 Nongmaiban

131 Nongmaiching Tampak
132 Nungka
133 Nungkot Khuman
134 Nungkot Kom
135 Old Boljang

136 P.Geljang
137 P.Khonomphai
138 P.Phaimol
139 Pangjang
140 Phaijang

141 Phaileng
142 Phailenjang
143 Phainom
144 Pheitaiching

145 Phoikon
146 Phowoibi
147 Phuleijang
148 Phunal Maring
149 Poirou Tangkhul

150 Purum Khullen
151 Purum Likli
152 Rishophung
153 S.Bolkot Sadar
154 S.Bungjang

155 S.Jangnomphai
156 S.Kanan
157 S.Khonomphai
158 S.Loushing
159 S.Mongbung

160 S.Phailenkot
161 Sada Tangkhul
162 Sadu Koireng
163 Saibol
164 Saichang

165 Saijang
166 Saikho
167 Saikul
168 Sailent
169 Salam Patong
170 Saman Tangkhul

171 Samusong
172 Sandangsemba
173 Satang Kuki
174 Selhao Vaiphei
175 Sijang & Sijang Molcham

176 Siloijang
177 Simol Sadar
178 Sinam Kom
179 Songbem
180 Songjang

181 Songpehjang
182 Songphel
183 Songphel Khullen
184 Sonphung
185 Soraland

186 T.Gamnom
187 T.Goyang
188 T.Wakanphai
189 Tangkhul Khullen
190 Tengkonphai

191 Teraphai
192 Th.Salemphai
193 Thangal Surung
194 Thangjingpokpi
195 Thangkan Thanglunpa

196 . Thangkanphai
197 . Thayong
198 . Thingjang
199 . Thingphai
200 . Thingsat

201 . Thombol
202. Tingpibung
203 . Tombi Hangbu
204 . Tongkoi
205. Tuinomjang

206 . Tuisenphai
207 . Tuisomjang
208 . Tusam
209. Twichamphai
210. Twichin Sadar

211 . Uran Chiru
212 . Urangpat
213 . Utonglok
214 . Vaiphei Pakai
215. Waichei

216 . Waithou Chiru
217 . Wakan
218 . Wapabung
219 . Y.Langkhong
220.  Zalenphai (Lhungtin)
221 . Zerukanan

Kangpokpi (SADAR Hills) District

Sadar Hills leh Kangpokpi District chungthua Pu Minister Ngamthang panlah dan:
Mipi hon ihet bangun sadar Hills jeh hin Hinkho mantamtah gei inachan uvin, ahin Nov. 8 2016 ni geijin imacha ana umdoh thei pon ahi. Hijong leh Nov.9 nichun kipa umtah in (Sadar Hills in ahop jouse) Kangpokpi chu District pilhing khat ahung hitan, chugoh hilou vin Tengnoupal toh imu tha nalai set un, kipa a um lheh jenge. Ahin a kidangtah khat chu ahileh mi phabep in Sadar Hills ki deldel a tun akidel mangtai aki kit in ahi.
Sadar Hills thu ana Kiseidohna mun phabepho gahve uhite
# C.M Rishang Keishing: 1982 kum, Rishang Chief Minister ahilai jin Sadar Hills thu ana ki seidoh in, Govt. in pehding in pha anasan ahi. Ahin a boundary thua kinohna aum jeh in aban ana challha thei tapoi.
# Dy. C.M, Dr. Chandramany ki ngense: Deputy C.M pa hi Manipur History hethem pen-a kisei ahin amahi Boundary Chairman in ana lhengdoh uvin, aman jong ima cha ana lothei loujeh in seilhah louvin ana umkit tai.
# C.M Nipamacha: Nipamacha C.M ahilaijin, Pu Ngamthang Haokip in, Cabinet Minister Meeting ah ana podohin, lunghang tahin “Sadar Hills” hi ipeh lou ngal ding uleh “pehtah lou dingin kilol lhautin, peh ding ahileh Sub division thum (Kangpokpi, Saikul, Saitu Gamphajol ” in ahop sese Sadar Hills Boundary hiding ahi tia ana podoh leh, Samuel Gindai, TD Minister pan nasa tah in objection anabol in ahi. Ahin, C.M. Nipamachan, “Minister Ngamthang in asei chu adih e” tia Pu Ngamthang chu ahin panpi jalin, Sadar Hills akipeh nileh hichi SUBDIVISION thum in ahom BLOCK sese chu Sadar Hills District hiding ahitia kinoptona ana um ahi.
# Tujangvaichong Block: District kiphondoh nin T.Vaichong chu Kangpokpi ah ana jaopoi. Ajeh chu hichi Boundary akilhe khen chun, achunga Subdivision thum in a hop block ho sese hiding ahiti khu ana geldoh hih un, constancy hon ahop dungjuija ana vet uleh, T. Vaichong chu Tadubi constancy hopsung ana hikhah jeh a chu Senapati District a na koi khah u ahi, ahinlah Kangpokpi Block ahijeh in Kangpokpi District sungah akoilut kit tauvin ahi.
#Area and Boundary: Tunia Kangpokpi District hin Sadar Hills Demand area jouse ahom in ahi. Chuleh Kangpokpi District akitilo najong hi, District dangjouse hi a town mincheh a kiminvo ahijeha Kangpokpi jong hi a Head Quarter mina kiminvo ahi.
Eihon thisan phala ina del u District chu tunin imu tauve, Ahivangin ahin boipi Minister, Pu Ngamthang pachat tahsangin Sadar Hills ahilou jeh ham, chuleh ipipi jeh ham khat ikoi be uvin demna johin imang uvin aphamo lheh jenge. Midanghon vang nopmo or deimo aneina laitahu mun a jong deithei leh kipa na thei khat aholdoh teijun; ahin eihon vang ideina munlai tah ajong semthu deilou khatbeh umsah a PACHAT NATHEI munho chu suhmang teitei ding ikigot utoh akilouve. Gelthei khat chu, Pu Ngamthang masanga MLA ana kaiho chun ana boipiu henlang hileh anabaijo maithei ahi, ajeh chu hichi thu hi asatpet anahi jo ding ahi. Ahin tunung, ahahsat cheh2 jouva jong Pu Minister Ngamthangin ahin boipi a tunia District pilhing cheh ni ineithei uhi suhmil hoi ahipoi. Pathen in Pu Minister Ngamthang umpi jing ta hen.